Customs valuation must use comparable contemporary imports, while confiscation fines and penalties require proportionate recalculation on reassessed v...
Depositor-protection proceedings prevail over corporate insolvency, while liquidators may recover chit receivables using copies of seized company reco...
Intermediary service classification fails where overseas admission facilitation is supplied independently, preserving export treatment and small-provi...
Satellite transponder bandwidth is telecommunication, not Business Support Service; foreign non-telegraph providers triggered no service tax liability...
Commitment proceedings gain extended timelines, structured defect refiling, and automatic resumption of inquiry after the adjusted completion period e...
Centralised assessment transfer becomes unwarranted once the searched person's assessment is complete, requiring restoration to the appropriate charge...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
321 to 340 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A pending claim for monetary reward under CBDT reward guidelines concerned an Income Tax Department officer who asserted exceptional and meritorious service in detecting TDS defaults, gathering intelligence, creating substantial tax demands, and effecting revenue recovery. A prior recommendation in the petitioner's favour was already on record, so the HC directed the petitioner to file that recommendation, the order, and the writ petition before the competent respondent. The claim was then to be examined and decided strictly in accordance with law through a reasoned and speaking order within 45 days of submission.
A pending claim for monetary reward under CBDT reward guidelines concerned an Income Tax Department officer who asserted exceptional and meritorious service in detecting TDS defaults, gathering intelligence, creating substantial tax demands, and effecting revenue recovery. A prior recommendation in the petitioner's favour was already on record, so the HC directed the petitioner to file that recommendation, the order, and the writ petition before the competent respondent. The claim was then to be examined and decided strictly in accordance with law through a reasoned and speaking order within 45 days of submission.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.