Fraudulently obtained SEIS scrips cannot support customs exemption; recovery, confiscation and penalties were sustained, but employee penalty fell awa...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5081 to 5100 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Continued detention in a PMLA matter was found unjustified after investigation was completed and the prosecution complaint had been filed, because custodial interrogation was no longer required. The High Court also noted that the ECIR arose from the predicate offence, in which bail had already been granted by the Supreme Court, and that the applicant had remained in custody for a substantial period without material showing risk of absconding, tampering with evidence, or influencing witnesses. Reading Section 45 in line with Arvind Walia, the Court held that the twin conditions were satisfied on the facts and granted regular bail subject to conditions.
Continued detention in a PMLA matter was found unjustified after investigation was completed and the prosecution complaint had been filed, because custodial interrogation was no longer required. The High Court also noted that the ECIR arose from the predicate offence, in which bail had already been granted by the Supreme Court, and that the applicant had remained in custody for a substantial period without material showing risk of absconding, tampering with evidence, or influencing witnesses. Reading Section 45 in line with Arvind Walia, the Court held that the twin conditions were satisfied on the facts and granted regular bail subject to conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.