Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether regular bail should be granted in a PMLA prosecution after completion of investigation and filing of the prosecution complaint, in the context of the statutory restrictions under Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.
Analysis: The applicant had remained in custody for a substantial period and the ECIR arose out of the predicate offence. The investigation qua the applicant stood concluded and the prosecution complaint had already been filed. The record also showed that the applicant was arrested after a long delay, despite earlier searches and availability of the applicant in custody, and that further custodial interrogation was no longer required. The Court treated the continued detention as serving no fruitful purpose, and held that Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 cannot be used to justify indefinite incarceration where the investigative stage has ended and trial is likely to take time.
Conclusion: Regular bail was held to be warranted and was granted in favour of the applicant.
Final Conclusion: The applicant was enlarged on bail because the investigation was complete, the complaint had been filed, and further pre-trial custody was found unnecessary.
Ratio Decidendi: Once investigation is complete and custody is no longer required for inquiry or evidence collection, prolonged pre-trial detention cannot be sustained merely by invoking the restrictive bail conditions under Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.