Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
International cargo transhipment through Indian ports continues with Customs-controlled storage, re-export safeguards, and coordinated multi-station m...
Continued detention in a PMLA matter was found unjustified after investigation was completed and the prosecution complaint had been filed, because custodial interrogation was no longer required. The High Court also noted that the ECIR arose from the predicate offence, in which bail had already been granted by the Supreme Court, and that the applicant had remained in custody for a substantial period without material showing risk of absconding, tampering with evidence, or influencing witnesses. Reading Section 45 in line with Arvind Walia, the Court held that the twin conditions were satisfied on the facts and granted regular bail subject to conditions.
Continued detention in a PMLA matter was found unjustified after investigation was completed and the prosecution complaint had been filed, because custodial interrogation was no longer required. The High Court also noted that the ECIR arose from the predicate offence, in which bail had already been granted by the Supreme Court, and that the applicant had remained in custody for a substantial period without material showing risk of absconding, tampering with evidence, or influencing witnesses. Reading Section 45 in line with Arvind Walia, the Court held that the twin conditions were satisfied on the facts and granted regular bail subject to conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.