Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Contractual supply of food to corporate clients was held to be a supply of service, not restaurant service, because the provider was engaged in menu finalisation, hygiene and quality oversight, delivery coordination, and personnel deployment under service agreements. The activity did not involve its own restaurant, eating joint, mess or canteen premises, and did not fall within outdoor catering or hotel accommodation. It was classified under SAC 996337 as a residual food and beverage service, outside entries 7(i) to 7(v) of Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate), and therefore taxable under entry 7(vi) at 18% GST. The advance ruling was affirmed.
Contractual supply of food to corporate clients was held to be a supply of service, not restaurant service, because the provider was engaged in menu finalisation, hygiene and quality oversight, delivery coordination, and personnel deployment under service agreements. The activity did not involve its own restaurant, eating joint, mess or canteen premises, and did not fall within outdoor catering or hotel accommodation. It was classified under SAC 996337 as a residual food and beverage service, outside entries 7(i) to 7(v) of Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate), and therefore taxable under entry 7(vi) at 18% GST. The advance ruling was affirmed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
