Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Section 54F was construed as a beneficial provision whose substance is timely investment of capital gains in a residential house, and the Tribunal held that exemption could not be denied where that substantive requirement was met. The assessee's investment was found genuine and the discrepancy in the flat number was explained by developer records, which the Revenue did not rebut. Non-deposit of the unutilised amount in the Capital Gain Account Scheme before the due date under section 139(1) was treated as a technical lapse only, so the deduction was allowed in full and the capital gains addition was deleted.
Section 54F was construed as a beneficial provision whose substance is timely investment of capital gains in a residential house, and the Tribunal held that exemption could not be denied where that substantive requirement was met. The assessee's investment was found genuine and the discrepancy in the flat number was explained by developer records, which the Revenue did not rebut. Non-deposit of the unutilised amount in the Capital Gain Account Scheme before the due date under section 139(1) was treated as a technical lapse only, so the deduction was allowed in full and the capital gains addition was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
