Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether deduction under section 54F of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be denied merely because the unutilised capital gain was not deposited in the Capital Gain Account Scheme before the due date under section 139(1), when the entire amount was invested in the residential house within the statutory period.
Analysis: The statutory purpose of section 54F is to encourage investment in a residential house and it is to be construed liberally as a beneficial provision. Once the substantive condition of investing the capital gain in acquisition or construction of the residential property within the prescribed time is satisfied, failure to deposit the unutilised amount in the Capital Gain Account Scheme is only a procedural lapse. The Revenue did not controvert the genuineness of the investment, and the earlier objection regarding the flat description was treated as explained on the basis of authenticated documents.
Conclusion: The deduction under section 54F could not be denied on the ground of non-deposit in the Capital Gain Account Scheme, and the disallowance was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: A beneficial exemption for residential investment cannot be defeated by a mere technical non-compliance with the Capital Gain Account Scheme requirement where the assessee has otherwise made the qualifying investment within the prescribed period.