Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The Tribunal applied the real income principle and held that gross interest was not taxable in the assessee's hands because he merely facilitated funding, the lenders advanced money directly to the company, and interest was paid directly by the company to those lenders. The addition on that component was deleted. On the TDS credit claim, the Tribunal held that once credit was claimed in the assessee's name, he had to prove with documentary evidence that the corresponding benefit had been passed on to the actual lenders. As no bank trail, reconciliation, or other proof was produced, the TDS-related amount remained unexplained and the addition was sustained to that extent.
The Tribunal applied the real income principle and held that gross interest was not taxable in the assessee's hands because he merely facilitated funding, the lenders advanced money directly to the company, and interest was paid directly by the company to those lenders. The addition on that component was deleted. On the TDS credit claim, the Tribunal held that once credit was claimed in the assessee's name, he had to prove with documentary evidence that the corresponding benefit had been passed on to the actual lenders. As no bank trail, reconciliation, or other proof was produced, the TDS-related amount remained unexplained and the addition was sustained to that extent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.