<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Real income principle excludes facilitator&#039;s interest income, but TDS credit claim fails without proof of pass-through to lenders.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99711</link>
    <description>The Tribunal applied the real income principle and held that gross interest was not taxable in the assessee&#039;s hands because he merely facilitated funding, the lenders advanced money directly to the company, and interest was paid directly by the company to those lenders. The addition on that component was deleted. On the TDS credit claim, the Tribunal held that once credit was claimed in the assessee&#039;s name, he had to prove with documentary evidence that the corresponding benefit had been passed on to the actual lenders. As no bank trail, reconciliation, or other proof was produced, the TDS-related amount remained unexplained and the addition was sustained to that extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 08:36:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 08:36:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=901565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Real income principle excludes facilitator&#039;s interest income, but TDS credit claim fails without proof of pass-through to lenders.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99711</link>
      <description>The Tribunal applied the real income principle and held that gross interest was not taxable in the assessee&#039;s hands because he merely facilitated funding, the lenders advanced money directly to the company, and interest was paid directly by the company to those lenders. The addition on that component was deleted. On the TDS credit claim, the Tribunal held that once credit was claimed in the assessee&#039;s name, he had to prove with documentary evidence that the corresponding benefit had been passed on to the actual lenders. As no bank trail, reconciliation, or other proof was produced, the TDS-related amount remained unexplained and the addition was sustained to that extent.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 08:36:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>