Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4800
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2601 to 2620 of 96000 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Tribunal applied the real income principle and held that gross interest was not taxable in the assessee's hands because he merely facilitated funding, the lenders advanced money directly to the company, and interest was paid directly by the company to those lenders. The addition on that component was deleted. On the TDS credit claim, the Tribunal held that once credit was claimed in the assessee's name, he had to prove with documentary evidence that the corresponding benefit had been passed on to the actual lenders. As no bank trail, reconciliation, or other proof was produced, the TDS-related amount remained unexplained and the addition was sustained to that extent.
The Tribunal applied the real income principle and held that gross interest was not taxable in the assessee's hands because he merely facilitated funding, the lenders advanced money directly to the company, and interest was paid directly by the company to those lenders. The addition on that component was deleted. On the TDS credit claim, the Tribunal held that once credit was claimed in the assessee's name, he had to prove with documentary evidence that the corresponding benefit had been passed on to the actual lenders. As no bank trail, reconciliation, or other proof was produced, the TDS-related amount remained unexplained and the addition was sustained to that extent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.