Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1381 to 1400 of 96176 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Ambulance-based emergency medical services were treated as a professional service, not a mere carriage or works contract, because the ambulances were specially equipped and staffed to provide treatment and monitoring during the critical initial period; tax was therefore deductible under section 194J, and the plea based on acceptance of section 194C treatment in an earlier year failed because each assessment year is separate and res judicata or estoppel does not apply in income-tax proceedings. The classifications for the HLL and FSMS contracts were set aside because the contractual terms and the assessee's submissions were not properly examined, requiring fresh consideration by the Assessing Officer.
Ambulance-based emergency medical services were treated as a professional service, not a mere carriage or works contract, because the ambulances were specially equipped and staffed to provide treatment and monitoring during the critical initial period; tax was therefore deductible under section 194J, and the plea based on acceptance of section 194C treatment in an earlier year failed because each assessment year is separate and res judicata or estoppel does not apply in income-tax proceedings. The classifications for the HLL and FSMS contracts were set aside because the contractual terms and the assessee's submissions were not properly examined, requiring fresh consideration by the Assessing Officer.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.