Specialised ambulance services fall under TDS as professional services, while composite HLL and FSMS contracts need fresh scrutiny.

Ambulance-based emergency medical services were treated as specialised medical services rather than mere transport because the vehicles carried medical apparatus, medicines and emergency technicians for pre-hospital care and stabilisation; the payments to BVG were therefore held to fall under section 194J, not section 194C. By contrast, the contracts with HLL and FSMS involving sample collection, transport, storage, reporting and biomedical equipment maintenance were not sufficiently analysed on their actual terms, so the classification question under section 194J or section 194C was remanded for fresh examination. The governing principle is that TDS classification depends on the real and dominant nature of composite contractual services.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether payments for ambulance-based emergency medical services to BVG attracted deduction of tax at source under section 194J of the Income-tax Act, 1961, or fell under section 194C of the Income-tax Act, 1961; (ii) Whether the contracts with HLL and FSMS required taxation under section 194J of the Income-tax Act, 1961 or warranted fresh examination on the basis of the contractual terms.

Issue (i): Whether payments for ambulance-based emergency medical services to BVG attracted deduction of tax at source under section 194J of the Income-tax Act, 1961, or fell under section 194C of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: The ambulance arrangement was found to involve more than mere carriage of patients. The service vehicles were equipped with medical apparatus, medicines and emergency medical technicians, and were designed to provide pre-hospital emergency care and patient stabilisation. On these terms, the service assumed the character of a specialised medical service rather than a simple works contract. The presence of ambulance staff and medical support was integral to the service and not merely incidental to transport.

Conclusion: The payments to BVG were held to fall under section 194J and not section 194C. The assessee's challenge on this issue failed.

Issue (ii): Whether the contracts with HLL and FSMS required taxation under section 194J of the Income-tax Act, 1961 or warranted fresh examination on the basis of the contractual terms.

Analysis: The contractual terms governing sample collection, transport, storage, reporting and biomedical equipment maintenance were not adequately analysed by the lower authorities. The materials placed before the Tribunal indicated that the agreements contained composite obligations and that some activities could potentially be logistical or maintenance-related rather than professional services. Since the precise contractual clauses were central to the classification exercise, a detailed reappraisal was necessary before deciding whether section 194J or section 194C applied.

Conclusion: The findings on the HLL and FSMS contracts were set aside and the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. This issue was decided in favour of the assessee to that extent.

Final Conclusion: The dispute was sustained only in part. The ambulance-service issue remained adverse to the assessee, while the controversy concerning HLL and FSMS was reopened for fresh adjudication.

Ratio Decidendi: Classification of TDS liability depends on the real and dominant nature of the contractual services, and composite contracts must be examined on their specific terms before deciding whether they constitute professional services or works contracts.

---