Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
901 to 920 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Ambulance-based emergency medical services were treated as a professional service, not a mere carriage or works contract, because the ambulances were specially equipped and staffed to provide treatment and monitoring during the critical initial period; tax was therefore deductible under section 194J, and the plea based on acceptance of section 194C treatment in an earlier year failed because each assessment year is separate and res judicata or estoppel does not apply in income-tax proceedings. The classifications for the HLL and FSMS contracts were set aside because the contractual terms and the assessee's submissions were not properly examined, requiring fresh consideration by the Assessing Officer.
Ambulance-based emergency medical services were treated as a professional service, not a mere carriage or works contract, because the ambulances were specially equipped and staffed to provide treatment and monitoring during the critical initial period; tax was therefore deductible under section 194J, and the plea based on acceptance of section 194C treatment in an earlier year failed because each assessment year is separate and res judicata or estoppel does not apply in income-tax proceedings. The classifications for the HLL and FSMS contracts were set aside because the contractual terms and the assessee's submissions were not properly examined, requiring fresh consideration by the Assessing Officer.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.