Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ambulance-based emergency medical services were treated as a professional service, not a mere carriage or works contract, because the ambulances were specially equipped and staffed to provide treatment and monitoring during the critical initial period; tax was therefore deductible under section 194J, and the plea based on acceptance of section 194C treatment in an earlier year failed because each assessment year is separate and res judicata or estoppel does not apply in income-tax proceedings. The classifications for the HLL and FSMS contracts were set aside because the contractual terms and the assessee's submissions were not properly examined, requiring fresh consideration by the Assessing Officer.
Ambulance-based emergency medical services were treated as a professional service, not a mere carriage or works contract, because the ambulances were specially equipped and staffed to provide treatment and monitoring during the critical initial period; tax was therefore deductible under section 194J, and the plea based on acceptance of section 194C treatment in an earlier year failed because each assessment year is separate and res judicata or estoppel does not apply in income-tax proceedings. The classifications for the HLL and FSMS contracts were set aside because the contractual terms and the assessee's submissions were not properly examined, requiring fresh consideration by the Assessing Officer.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
