Personal hearing requirements in GST adjudication were satisfied by prior opportunities and written submissions; appellate limitation received writ-pe...
Interactive flat panels meeting automatic data processing conditions are distinguished from monitors, while later classification clarifications apply ...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Binding interim judicial directions governed the treatment of leave travel concession payments during the relevant period, so the assessee was obliged to follow those directions and could not be treated as disobeying the TDS requirement under a stand-alone reading of the statute. As the Tribunal held that failure to deduct tax in those circumstances did not constitute default under section 201(1), the consequential interest under section 201(1A) also could not survive. The demand and interest were therefore deleted, and the appeals were allowed.
Binding interim judicial directions governed the treatment of leave travel concession payments during the relevant period, so the assessee was obliged to follow those directions and could not be treated as disobeying the TDS requirement under a stand-alone reading of the statute. As the Tribunal held that failure to deduct tax in those circumstances did not constitute default under section 201(1), the consequential interest under section 201(1A) also could not survive. The demand and interest were therefore deleted, and the appeals were allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.