Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee could be treated as an assessee in default under section 201(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and charged interest under section 201(1A), for non-deduction of tax at source on leave fare/travel concession payments during the period when binding interim judicial directions were operating.
Analysis: The dispute on the merits of exemption under section 10(5) had already stood concluded against the assessee by the Supreme Court. The limited controversy was whether the assessee's failure to deduct tax at source could still attract section 201 consequences when, during the relevant period, it was acting under binding interim directions of the High Court that restrained deduction on such payments. The Tribunal followed the coordinate bench decision and the allied High Court authorities holding that the obligation to deduct tax cannot be enforced in a manner inconsistent with binding judicial orders, and that non-deduction in compliance with such directions does not amount to default under section 201(1).
Conclusion: The assessee could not be treated as an assessee in default under section 201(1), and the interest under section 201(1A) also did not survive.