Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3001 to 3020 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Binding interim judicial directions governed the treatment of leave travel concession payments during the relevant period, so the assessee was obliged to follow those directions and could not be treated as disobeying the TDS requirement under a stand-alone reading of the statute. As the Tribunal held that failure to deduct tax in those circumstances did not constitute default under section 201(1), the consequential interest under section 201(1A) also could not survive. The demand and interest were therefore deleted, and the appeals were allowed.
Binding interim judicial directions governed the treatment of leave travel concession payments during the relevant period, so the assessee was obliged to follow those directions and could not be treated as disobeying the TDS requirement under a stand-alone reading of the statute. As the Tribunal held that failure to deduct tax in those circumstances did not constitute default under section 201(1), the consequential interest under section 201(1A) also could not survive. The demand and interest were therefore deleted, and the appeals were allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.