Penalty under section 271(1)(c) deleted where income was disclosed in section 153A returns and remaining additions were only estimated or computationa...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4561 to 4580 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
In an anti-profiteering inquiry under section 171, tax reduction and input tax credit issues must still be tested against evidence that prices may also be affected by market forces and higher input costs. The Tribunal accepted that any presumption of profiteering is rebuttable and must yield to clear evidence. Because the DGAP acknowledged the respondent's documents but did not meaningfully reconsider them, the report was found unsustainable. The matter was remanded for a fresh investigation from the beginning under Rule 133(4), with liberty to both sides to place further material.
In an anti-profiteering inquiry under section 171, tax reduction and input tax credit issues must still be tested against evidence that prices may also be affected by market forces and higher input costs. The Tribunal accepted that any presumption of profiteering is rebuttable and must yield to clear evidence. Because the DGAP acknowledged the respondent's documents but did not meaningfully reconsider them, the report was found unsustainable. The matter was remanded for a fresh investigation from the beginning under Rule 133(4), with liberty to both sides to place further material.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
