<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Rebuttable anti-profiteering presumption requires consideration of market forces and input costs; report remanded for fresh investigation.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99624</link>
    <description>In an anti-profiteering inquiry under section 171, tax reduction and input tax credit issues must still be tested against evidence that prices may also be affected by market forces and higher input costs. The Tribunal accepted that any presumption of profiteering is rebuttable and must yield to clear evidence. Because the DGAP acknowledged the respondent&#039;s documents but did not meaningfully reconsider them, the report was found unsustainable. The matter was remanded for a fresh investigation from the beginning under Rule 133(4), with liberty to both sides to place further material.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 07:40:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 07:40:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Rebuttable anti-profiteering presumption requires consideration of market forces and input costs; report remanded for fresh investigation.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99624</link>
      <description>In an anti-profiteering inquiry under section 171, tax reduction and input tax credit issues must still be tested against evidence that prices may also be affected by market forces and higher input costs. The Tribunal accepted that any presumption of profiteering is rebuttable and must yield to clear evidence. Because the DGAP acknowledged the respondent&#039;s documents but did not meaningfully reconsider them, the report was found unsustainable. The matter was remanded for a fresh investigation from the beginning under Rule 133(4), with liberty to both sides to place further material.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 07:40:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>