Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Receipts from sale of fly ash were held taxable as business income because fly ash was a by-product of the assessee's power generation business and the sale consideration accrued directly to the assessee. The Tribunal found no diversion of income at source by overriding title; the Government notification restricted only the subsequent use of the amounts after receipt, which amounted merely to application of income. The plea that the credited sum was a liability failed because no enforceable obligation to pay a definite third-party amount was shown, and book entries placing the receipts in a separate fund could not override the Act. The Revenue's appeals were allowed and the addition was restored for both years.
Receipts from sale of fly ash were held taxable as business income because fly ash was a by-product of the assessee's power generation business and the sale consideration accrued directly to the assessee. The Tribunal found no diversion of income at source by overriding title; the Government notification restricted only the subsequent use of the amounts after receipt, which amounted merely to application of income. The plea that the credited sum was a liability failed because no enforceable obligation to pay a definite third-party amount was shown, and book entries placing the receipts in a separate fund could not override the Act. The Revenue's appeals were allowed and the addition was restored for both years.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.