<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Fly ash sale proceeds held taxable as business income; separate fund credit was only application of income, not overriding title.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99613</link>
    <description>Receipts from sale of fly ash were held taxable as business income because fly ash was a by-product of the assessee&#039;s power generation business and the sale consideration accrued directly to the assessee. The Tribunal found no diversion of income at source by overriding title; the Government notification restricted only the subsequent use of the amounts after receipt, which amounted merely to application of income. The plea that the credited sum was a liability failed because no enforceable obligation to pay a definite third-party amount was shown, and book entries placing the receipts in a separate fund could not override the Act. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed and the addition was restored for both years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 07:35:24 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 07:35:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Fly ash sale proceeds held taxable as business income; separate fund credit was only application of income, not overriding title.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99613</link>
      <description>Receipts from sale of fly ash were held taxable as business income because fly ash was a by-product of the assessee&#039;s power generation business and the sale consideration accrued directly to the assessee. The Tribunal found no diversion of income at source by overriding title; the Government notification restricted only the subsequent use of the amounts after receipt, which amounted merely to application of income. The plea that the credited sum was a liability failed because no enforceable obligation to pay a definite third-party amount was shown, and book entries placing the receipts in a separate fund could not override the Act. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed and the addition was restored for both years.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 07:35:24 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>