Concessional Basic Customs Duty on Ethernet switches: classification as enterprise switches upheld, challenge dismissed for lack of substantial law qu...
Insolvency petition based on admitted debt and default upheld; challenge for malicious initiation rejected, settlement may proceed under resolution fr...
Quashing of FIR and challenge to ECIR over alleged diversion of funds and preferential ESOP pricing dismissed after prima facie money-laundering findi...
Limitation for an appeal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code runs from the date the impugned order is pronounced in open court, not from the date it is uploaded, received, or actually known to the appellant. Where pronouncement is established, a party must act diligently, apply for a certified copy, and can claim only the statutory exclusion for time requisite to obtain it. The appellate tribunal also reiterated that the condonable period under the appeal provision is strictly confined to thirty days plus a further fifteen days; no equitable extension is available beyond that outer limit. On that basis, both appeals filed after the limit were treated as time-barred and the delay applications were rejected.
Limitation for an appeal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code runs from the date the impugned order is pronounced in open court, not from the date it is uploaded, received, or actually known to the appellant. Where pronouncement is established, a party must act diligently, apply for a certified copy, and can claim only the statutory exclusion for time requisite to obtain it. The appellate tribunal also reiterated that the condonable period under the appeal provision is strictly confined to thirty days plus a further fifteen days; no equitable extension is available beyond that outer limit. On that basis, both appeals filed after the limit were treated as time-barred and the delay applications were rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
