Maintainability of a Section 7 insolvency petition against a financial service provider denied; appeal dismissed for non maintainability and complex d...
Provisional attachment under Prevention of Money Laundering Act requires exhaustion of statutory remedies; impugned order set aside, appeal to tribuna...
Restoration of property under Prevention of Money Laundering Act after attachment dispute rendered academic; possession directed to successful resolut...
Limitation for an appeal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code runs from the date the impugned order is pronounced in open court, not from the date it is uploaded, received, or actually known to the appellant. Where pronouncement is established, a party must act diligently, apply for a certified copy, and can claim only the statutory exclusion for time requisite to obtain it. The appellate tribunal also reiterated that the condonable period under the appeal provision is strictly confined to thirty days plus a further fifteen days; no equitable extension is available beyond that outer limit. On that basis, both appeals filed after the limit were treated as time-barred and the delay applications were rejected.
Limitation for an appeal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code runs from the date the impugned order is pronounced in open court, not from the date it is uploaded, received, or actually known to the appellant. Where pronouncement is established, a party must act diligently, apply for a certified copy, and can claim only the statutory exclusion for time requisite to obtain it. The appellate tribunal also reiterated that the condonable period under the appeal provision is strictly confined to thirty days plus a further fifteen days; no equitable extension is available beyond that outer limit. On that basis, both appeals filed after the limit were treated as time-barred and the delay applications were rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
