Donor-directed corpus contributions retain capital character despite exemption claims under section 10(23C)(vi), preventing their treatment as taxable...
Enhanced tax-audit threshold applies where banking records establish compliant non-cash receipts and payments, eliminating penalty exposure for audit ...
Transfer pricing consistency protects identical non-interest-bearing debenture terms from a later notional-interest adjustment without valid statutory...
Rectification of debatable deduction claims cannot reverse scrutiny-approved co-operative society interest income deductions as apparent record errors...
Cash-method accounting bars presumptive interest taxation, while unsupported securities and share-trading additions require reliable material and veri...
Section 7 admission requires established financial debt and default, not precise interest quantification, while post-suspension defaults remain action...
Page of 4821
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96408 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Homebuyers voting as a class through their authorised representative bound all class members, so individual dissenters could not unsettle a resolution plan that had already been validly approved and finally rejected in earlier challenge. The Court also held that the corporate veil could be lifted in CIRP where wholly owned or controlled subsidiaries functioned only as fronts for the holding company's integrated project activity; the leased project assets were therefore not outside the insolvency process. GNIDA was held disentitled to recover penal interest, penal charges and time-extension penalties because of its own delay and inaction, but it remained entitled to recalculated principal dues only, payable by the successful resolution applicants without interest during the payment period.
Homebuyers voting as a class through their authorised representative bound all class members, so individual dissenters could not unsettle a resolution plan that had already been validly approved and finally rejected in earlier challenge. The Court also held that the corporate veil could be lifted in CIRP where wholly owned or controlled subsidiaries functioned only as fronts for the holding company's integrated project activity; the leased project assets were therefore not outside the insolvency process. GNIDA was held disentitled to recover penal interest, penal charges and time-extension penalties because of its own delay and inaction, but it remained entitled to recalculated principal dues only, payable by the successful resolution applicants without interest during the payment period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.