Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Class voting, veil piercing and exclusion of penal dues shaped recovery under resolution plans for stalled projects.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Homebuyers voting as a class through their authorised representative bound all class members, so individual dissenters could not unsettle a resolution plan that had already been validly approved and finally rejected in earlier challenge. The Court also held that the corporate veil could be lifted in CIRP where wholly owned or controlled subsidiaries functioned only as fronts for the holding company's integrated project activity; the leased project assets were therefore not outside the insolvency process. GNIDA was held disentitled to recover penal interest, penal charges and time-extension penalties because of its own delay and inaction, but it remained entitled to recalculated principal dues only, payable by the successful resolution applicants without interest during the payment period.....