Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The ITAT held that an alleged unexplained investment in shares must be assessed in the correct year of taxability. On the basis of the contract-cum-bill, the broker's ledger and IDS disclosure material, it found that the shares were purchased on 02.07.2010, so the investment fell in AY 2011-12 and not AY 2012-13. The addition made in AY 2012-13 was therefore deleted and the appellate order set aside. The Tribunal left it open to the Assessing Officer to examine the source of the investment in the year of purchase in accordance with law.
The ITAT held that an alleged unexplained investment in shares must be assessed in the correct year of taxability. On the basis of the contract-cum-bill, the broker's ledger and IDS disclosure material, it found that the shares were purchased on 02.07.2010, so the investment fell in AY 2011-12 and not AY 2012-13. The addition made in AY 2012-13 was therefore deleted and the appellate order set aside. The Tribunal left it open to the Assessing Officer to examine the source of the investment in the year of purchase in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
