Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
The ITAT held that an alleged unexplained investment in shares must be assessed in the correct year of taxability. On the basis of the contract-cum-bill, the broker's ledger and IDS disclosure material, it found that the shares were purchased on 02.07.2010, so the investment fell in AY 2011-12 and not AY 2012-13. The addition made in AY 2012-13 was therefore deleted and the appellate order set aside. The Tribunal left it open to the Assessing Officer to examine the source of the investment in the year of purchase in accordance with law.
The ITAT held that an alleged unexplained investment in shares must be assessed in the correct year of taxability. On the basis of the contract-cum-bill, the broker's ledger and IDS disclosure material, it found that the shares were purchased on 02.07.2010, so the investment fell in AY 2011-12 and not AY 2012-13. The addition made in AY 2012-13 was therefore deleted and the appellate order set aside. The Tribunal left it open to the Assessing Officer to examine the source of the investment in the year of purchase in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
