Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
The ITAT held that an alleged unexplained investment in shares must be assessed in the correct year of taxability. On the basis of the contract-cum-bill, the broker's ledger and IDS disclosure material, it found that the shares were purchased on 02.07.2010, so the investment fell in AY 2011-12 and not AY 2012-13. The addition made in AY 2012-13 was therefore deleted and the appellate order set aside. The Tribunal left it open to the Assessing Officer to examine the source of the investment in the year of purchase in accordance with law.
The ITAT held that an alleged unexplained investment in shares must be assessed in the correct year of taxability. On the basis of the contract-cum-bill, the broker's ledger and IDS disclosure material, it found that the shares were purchased on 02.07.2010, so the investment fell in AY 2011-12 and not AY 2012-13. The addition made in AY 2012-13 was therefore deleted and the appellate order set aside. The Tribunal left it open to the Assessing Officer to examine the source of the investment in the year of purchase in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
