Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Turnover is a relevant comparability criterion in transfer pricing because scale affects profitability, risk profile, asset base, bargaining power and economies of scale; the Tribunal therefore upheld use of an upper turnover filter and rejected the Revenue's challenge to exclusion of high-turnover comparables. For inclusion of I2T2 India Limited and Cigniti Technologies Limited, the Tribunal held that a comparable cannot be adopted merely by relying on an earlier order without verifying contemporaneous financials, functional profile, applicable filters and segmental data for the year in question; that issue was remanded to the Assessing Officer/TPO for fresh examination after hearing the assessee.
Turnover is a relevant comparability criterion in transfer pricing because scale affects profitability, risk profile, asset base, bargaining power and economies of scale; the Tribunal therefore upheld use of an upper turnover filter and rejected the Revenue's challenge to exclusion of high-turnover comparables. For inclusion of I2T2 India Limited and Cigniti Technologies Limited, the Tribunal held that a comparable cannot be adopted merely by relying on an earlier order without verifying contemporaneous financials, functional profile, applicable filters and segmental data for the year in question; that issue was remanded to the Assessing Officer/TPO for fresh examination after hearing the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
