<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Transfer pricing turnover filter upheld, while inclusion of comparables was remanded for fresh factual verification.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99466</link>
    <description>Turnover is a relevant comparability criterion in transfer pricing because scale affects profitability, risk profile, asset base, bargaining power and economies of scale; the Tribunal therefore upheld use of an upper turnover filter and rejected the Revenue&#039;s challenge to exclusion of high-turnover comparables. For inclusion of I2T2 India Limited and Cigniti Technologies Limited, the Tribunal held that a comparable cannot be adopted merely by relying on an earlier order without verifying contemporaneous financials, functional profile, applicable filters and segmental data for the year in question; that issue was remanded to the Assessing Officer/TPO for fresh examination after hearing the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 09:09:34 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 09:09:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=899862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Transfer pricing turnover filter upheld, while inclusion of comparables was remanded for fresh factual verification.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99466</link>
      <description>Turnover is a relevant comparability criterion in transfer pricing because scale affects profitability, risk profile, asset base, bargaining power and economies of scale; the Tribunal therefore upheld use of an upper turnover filter and rejected the Revenue&#039;s challenge to exclusion of high-turnover comparables. For inclusion of I2T2 India Limited and Cigniti Technologies Limited, the Tribunal held that a comparable cannot be adopted merely by relying on an earlier order without verifying contemporaneous financials, functional profile, applicable filters and segmental data for the year in question; that issue was remanded to the Assessing Officer/TPO for fresh examination after hearing the assessee.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 09:09:34 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>