Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Page of 4824
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 96463 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The amended reassessment regime requires exclusion of the period covered by deemed Section 148A proceedings, including the time taken to supply information and the assessee's response period, when computing limitation. Applying Ashish Agarwal, Rajeev Bansal and the limitation-extension principles recognised in TOLA/Cognizance, the Court treated the earlier notice as a deemed Section 148A(b) notice and found the Section 148A(d) order and consequential Section 148 notice issued on 30.07.2022 to be within time. On sanction, Section 151 as amended from 01.04.2021 permits approval by any authority named in clause (ii) after three years from the end of the assessment year, so approval by the Director General was sufficient.
The amended reassessment regime requires exclusion of the period covered by deemed Section 148A proceedings, including the time taken to supply information and the assessee's response period, when computing limitation. Applying Ashish Agarwal, Rajeev Bansal and the limitation-extension principles recognised in TOLA/Cognizance, the Court treated the earlier notice as a deemed Section 148A(b) notice and found the Section 148A(d) order and consequential Section 148 notice issued on 30.07.2022 to be within time. On sanction, Section 151 as amended from 01.04.2021 permits approval by any authority named in clause (ii) after three years from the end of the assessment year, so approval by the Director General was sufficient.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
