Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Accumulation under section 11(2) could not be denied where the trust filed Form No. 10 within time, the stated purpose of repair, renovation and maintenance of temple-related premises fell within the trust's religious and charitable objects, and the accumulated funds were invested in fixed deposits with HDFC Bank, a permissible mode under section 11(5). Minor variations or general descriptions in Form No. 10 were held insufficient by themselves to defeat the benefit. Only the limited factual issue of verifying the dates of investment was remanded to the Assessing Officer for examination and consequential relief in accordance with law.
Accumulation under section 11(2) could not be denied where the trust filed Form No. 10 within time, the stated purpose of repair, renovation and maintenance of temple-related premises fell within the trust's religious and charitable objects, and the accumulated funds were invested in fixed deposits with HDFC Bank, a permissible mode under section 11(5). Minor variations or general descriptions in Form No. 10 were held insufficient by themselves to defeat the benefit. Only the limited factual issue of verifying the dates of investment was remanded to the Assessing Officer for examination and consequential relief in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
