Accumulation relief under trust law upheld despite minor Form No. 10 variations and permitted bank investment

A registered trust was not to be denied accumulation relief merely because Form No. 10 used minor variations in describing the purpose, where the stated objects of repair, renovation and maintenance remained within the trust's objects. Investment of the accumulated funds in fixed deposits with a scheduled bank was treated as a permissible mode under section 11(5), supporting entitlement under section 11(2). Only the exact dates of certain investments were left for verification by the AO, with relief to follow accordingly.

---

---

Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to exemption for accumulated income under section 11(2) despite the alleged mismatch in the stated purpose of accumulation and alleged non-compliance with the investment requirements under section 11(5), and whether the denial of the claim was justified.

Analysis: The assessee was a registered trust that had filed Form No. 10 within time and had specified the purposes for accumulation. The stated purposes of repair, renovation, maintenance of temple premises and related structures were held to be within the objects of the trust. The accumulated funds were invested in fixed deposits with a scheduled bank, which was treated as a permissible mode under section 11(5). Minor variations in the description of purpose in Form No. 10 were held insufficient, by themselves, to deny the benefit under section 11(2), so long as the accumulation remained within the trust objects. However, the exact dates of certain investments were directed to be verified by the Assessing Officer.

Conclusion: The denial of exemption was not sustained in full. The assessee was held entitled to the benefit of accumulation in principle, but the matter was restored for limited verification of investment dates and consequential grant of relief in accordance with law.

Final Conclusion: The assessee's claim under the accumulation provisions was accepted in substance, with only a limited factual verification left open before the Assessing Officer.

Ratio Decidendi: A trust cannot be denied the benefit of accumulation merely because of minor descriptive variations in Form No. 10, where the stated purpose remains within its objects and the investments are otherwise made in a permissible mode under the statute.

---