Charitable registration renewal cannot become an assessment of receipts, profitability or annual exemption compliance, requiring renewal and donation ...
AMP expenditure for own business is not an international transaction without an associated-enterprise arrangement, eliminating transfer pricing adjust...
Customs valuation must use comparable contemporary imports, while confiscation fines and penalties require proportionate recalculation on reassessed v...
Depositor-protection proceedings prevail over corporate insolvency, while liquidators may recover chit receivables using copies of seized company reco...
Intermediary service classification fails where overseas admission facilitation is supplied independently, preserving export treatment and small-provi...
Satellite transponder bandwidth is telecommunication, not Business Support Service; foreign non-telegraph providers triggered no service tax liability...
Page of 4824
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
441 to 460 of 96463 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Accumulation under section 11(2) could not be denied where the trust filed Form No. 10 within time, the stated purpose of repair, renovation and maintenance of temple-related premises fell within the trust's religious and charitable objects, and the accumulated funds were invested in fixed deposits with HDFC Bank, a permissible mode under section 11(5). Minor variations or general descriptions in Form No. 10 were held insufficient by themselves to defeat the benefit. Only the limited factual issue of verifying the dates of investment was remanded to the Assessing Officer for examination and consequential relief in accordance with law.
Accumulation under section 11(2) could not be denied where the trust filed Form No. 10 within time, the stated purpose of repair, renovation and maintenance of temple-related premises fell within the trust's religious and charitable objects, and the accumulated funds were invested in fixed deposits with HDFC Bank, a permissible mode under section 11(5). Minor variations or general descriptions in Form No. 10 were held insufficient by themselves to defeat the benefit. Only the limited factual issue of verifying the dates of investment was remanded to the Assessing Officer for examination and consequential relief in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.