Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2701 to 2720 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Accumulation under section 11(2) could not be denied where the trust filed Form No. 10 within time, the stated purpose of repair, renovation and maintenance of temple-related premises fell within the trust's religious and charitable objects, and the accumulated funds were invested in fixed deposits with HDFC Bank, a permissible mode under section 11(5). Minor variations or general descriptions in Form No. 10 were held insufficient by themselves to defeat the benefit. Only the limited factual issue of verifying the dates of investment was remanded to the Assessing Officer for examination and consequential relief in accordance with law.
Accumulation under section 11(2) could not be denied where the trust filed Form No. 10 within time, the stated purpose of repair, renovation and maintenance of temple-related premises fell within the trust's religious and charitable objects, and the accumulated funds were invested in fixed deposits with HDFC Bank, a permissible mode under section 11(5). Minor variations or general descriptions in Form No. 10 were held insufficient by themselves to defeat the benefit. Only the limited factual issue of verifying the dates of investment was remanded to the Assessing Officer for examination and consequential relief in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
