Transfer-pricing benchmarking and capital-receipt principles sustained taxpayer relief, while unsupported property-advance write-offs remained disallo...
Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Transfer pricing benchmarking under the Comparable Uncontrolled Price method turned on whether commodity broker quotations from Sunvin Group and MMSPL could be treated as reliable external CUP data. The Tribunal, following earlier Delhi High Court and ITAT decisions, held that such quotations are valid where they relate to the actual transaction, are publicly available, and no material casts doubt on their authenticity or reliability. On that basis, rejection of the quotations was unsustainable, the assessee's challenge succeeded, and the transfer pricing adjustment was deleted; the remaining connected grounds became infructuous.
Transfer pricing benchmarking under the Comparable Uncontrolled Price method turned on whether commodity broker quotations from Sunvin Group and MMSPL could be treated as reliable external CUP data. The Tribunal, following earlier Delhi High Court and ITAT decisions, held that such quotations are valid where they relate to the actual transaction, are publicly available, and no material casts doubt on their authenticity or reliability. On that basis, rejection of the quotations was unsustainable, the assessee's challenge succeeded, and the transfer pricing adjustment was deleted; the remaining connected grounds became infructuous.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.