TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether quotations from Sunvin Group and MMSPL could be used as comparable uncontrolled price data for benchmarking the import of crude palm oil, and whether the transfer pricing adjustment was liable to be deleted; (ii) whether the initiation of penalty proceedings under section 270A was liable to be interfered with.
Issue (i): Whether quotations from Sunvin Group and MMSPL could be used as comparable uncontrolled price data for benchmarking the import of crude palm oil, and whether the transfer pricing adjustment was liable to be deleted.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that price publications and commodity market quotations are recognised materials for CUP analysis when they are authentic and reliable. It followed the line of authorities holding that broker or quotation-based data, including quotations from Sunvin Group and MMSPL, can be valid CUP inputs where no material exists to doubt their reliability. On that basis, the rejection of those quotations by the transfer pricing authorities was held to be unjustified.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee, and the transfer pricing addition was deleted.
Issue (ii): Whether the initiation of penalty proceedings under section 270A was liable to be interfered with.
Analysis: The challenge to penalty initiation was treated as premature because penalty proceedings are separate from the assessment proceedings.
Conclusion: The issue was decided against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only to the extent of deletion of the transfer pricing adjustment, while the remaining challenge to penalty initiation did not succeed.
Ratio Decidendi: Authentic and reliable price quotations or market publications may constitute valid CUP data for benchmarking an international transaction, even if they are not actual transaction prices, where no material is brought to discredit their basis.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
