Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Transfer pricing benchmarking under the Comparable Uncontrolled Price method turned on whether commodity broker quotations from Sunvin Group and MMSPL could be treated as reliable external CUP data. The Tribunal, following earlier Delhi High Court and ITAT decisions, held that such quotations are valid where they relate to the actual transaction, are publicly available, and no material casts doubt on their authenticity or reliability. On that basis, rejection of the quotations was unsustainable, the assessee's challenge succeeded, and the transfer pricing adjustment was deleted; the remaining connected grounds became infructuous.
Transfer pricing benchmarking under the Comparable Uncontrolled Price method turned on whether commodity broker quotations from Sunvin Group and MMSPL could be treated as reliable external CUP data. The Tribunal, following earlier Delhi High Court and ITAT decisions, held that such quotations are valid where they relate to the actual transaction, are publicly available, and no material casts doubt on their authenticity or reliability. On that basis, rejection of the quotations was unsustainable, the assessee's challenge succeeded, and the transfer pricing adjustment was deleted; the remaining connected grounds became infructuous.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.