Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Transfer pricing benchmarking under the Comparable Uncontrolled Price method turned on whether commodity broker quotations from Sunvin Group and MMSPL could be treated as reliable external CUP data. The Tribunal, following earlier Delhi High Court and ITAT decisions, held that such quotations are valid where they relate to the actual transaction, are publicly available, and no material casts doubt on their authenticity or reliability. On that basis, rejection of the quotations was unsustainable, the assessee's challenge succeeded, and the transfer pricing adjustment was deleted; the remaining connected grounds became infructuous.
Transfer pricing benchmarking under the Comparable Uncontrolled Price method turned on whether commodity broker quotations from Sunvin Group and MMSPL could be treated as reliable external CUP data. The Tribunal, following earlier Delhi High Court and ITAT decisions, held that such quotations are valid where they relate to the actual transaction, are publicly available, and no material casts doubt on their authenticity or reliability. On that basis, rejection of the quotations was unsustainable, the assessee's challenge succeeded, and the transfer pricing adjustment was deleted; the remaining connected grounds became infructuous.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.