Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Transfer pricing benchmarking under the Comparable Uncontrolled Price method turned on whether commodity broker quotations from Sunvin Group and MMSPL could be treated as reliable external CUP data. The Tribunal, following earlier Delhi High Court and ITAT decisions, held that such quotations are valid where they relate to the actual transaction, are publicly available, and no material casts doubt on their authenticity or reliability. On that basis, rejection of the quotations was unsustainable, the assessee's challenge succeeded, and the transfer pricing adjustment was deleted; the remaining connected grounds became infructuous.
Transfer pricing benchmarking under the Comparable Uncontrolled Price method turned on whether commodity broker quotations from Sunvin Group and MMSPL could be treated as reliable external CUP data. The Tribunal, following earlier Delhi High Court and ITAT decisions, held that such quotations are valid where they relate to the actual transaction, are publicly available, and no material casts doubt on their authenticity or reliability. On that basis, rejection of the quotations was unsustainable, the assessee's challenge succeeded, and the transfer pricing adjustment was deleted; the remaining connected grounds became infructuous.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
