Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
A development agreement did not trigger a taxable transfer under the capital gains provisions because the possession granted was only for limited development purposes and not possession in the nature contemplated by section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act. The Tribunal also found no material to show receipt of any consideration, monetary or otherwise, in the year of execution. Applying the binding High Court ruling in Smt. Shantha Vidyasagar Annam, it held that the essential conditions for transfer under section 45 were absent, so no long-term capital gains arose in the relevant year and the addition was deleted.
A development agreement did not trigger a taxable transfer under the capital gains provisions because the possession granted was only for limited development purposes and not possession in the nature contemplated by section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act. The Tribunal also found no material to show receipt of any consideration, monetary or otherwise, in the year of execution. Applying the binding High Court ruling in Smt. Shantha Vidyasagar Annam, it held that the essential conditions for transfer under section 45 were absent, so no long-term capital gains arose in the relevant year and the addition was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
