Joint development agreement possession for limited development without consideration did not trigger capital gains tax.

Execution of a joint development agreement did not amount to a transfer for capital gains purposes where possession was handed over only for limited development activity and no consideration was received during the year. On those facts, the conditions for deeming transfer under section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act, read with section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, were not satisfied, so section 45(1) did not apply. The long-term capital gain addition was therefore deleted, and the appeal was allowed on the core chargeability issue.

---

---

Issues: Whether execution of a joint development agreement, where possession was handed over only for limited development purposes and no consideration was received, constituted a transfer attracting capital gains tax under the Act.

Analysis: The possession under the development agreement was found to be limited to enabling development activity and not an absolute handing over of possession within the meaning of section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The assessee had also not received any consideration during the year of execution. In these circumstances, the essential conditions for invoking section 2(47)(v) and section 45(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were not satisfied. The decision followed the binding jurisdictional precedent that, in the absence of consideration and legally effective possession for part performance, no transfer arises for capital gains purposes.

Conclusion: No taxable capital gain arose in the assessee's hands for the year under consideration, and the addition made on account of long-term capital gain was directed to be deleted.

Final Conclusion: The appeal was allowed on the core question of chargeability of capital gains arising from the joint development agreement, and the remaining grounds were not adjudicated.

Ratio Decidendi: Where possession under a joint development agreement is given only for the limited purpose of development and no consideration is received, there is no transfer within the meaning of section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, so capital gains do not accrue under section 45(1).

---