Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether execution of the joint development agreement, without receipt of consideration and with possession handed over only for the limited purpose of development, amounted to a transfer under section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 so as to attract capital gains tax under section 45(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The possession recorded in the agreement was only for enabling the developer to obtain approvals and undertake construction, and not an absolute transfer in the nature contemplated by section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. It was also undisputed that no consideration had been received from the developer during the year of execution of the agreement. In these circumstances, the essential conditions for invoking section 2(47)(v) and charging capital gains under section 45(1) were not satisfied.
Conclusion: No taxable transfer occurred in the relevant year and the addition made on account of long-term capital gains was liable to be deleted in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: For a development agreement to constitute a transfer attracting capital gains, possession must be handed over in the manner contemplated by section 53A and consideration must accrue or be received; limited development possession without consideration does not trigger section 2(47)(v) or section 45(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.