Composite GST notices, mandatory limitation, and same-subject bar: HC upheld valid notices but quashed overlapping proceedings and unauthorised withho...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A development agreement did not trigger a taxable transfer under the capital gains provisions because the possession granted was only for limited development purposes and not possession in the nature contemplated by section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act. The Tribunal also found no material to show receipt of any consideration, monetary or otherwise, in the year of execution. Applying the binding High Court ruling in Smt. Shantha Vidyasagar Annam, it held that the essential conditions for transfer under section 45 were absent, so no long-term capital gains arose in the relevant year and the addition was deleted.
A development agreement did not trigger a taxable transfer under the capital gains provisions because the possession granted was only for limited development purposes and not possession in the nature contemplated by section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act. The Tribunal also found no material to show receipt of any consideration, monetary or otherwise, in the year of execution. Applying the binding High Court ruling in Smt. Shantha Vidyasagar Annam, it held that the essential conditions for transfer under section 45 were absent, so no long-term capital gains arose in the relevant year and the addition was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
