Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1201 to 1220 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Post-approval tariff revision did not create an independent right to refund or set-off for pre-CIRP electricity dues where the approved resolution plan had already settled and frozen pre-CIRP liabilities inter se the parties. The revised bills were treated only as an internal accounting adjustment reflecting the reduced extent of the respondent's pre-CIRP claim and bad debt, not as an enforceable fresh demand against the appellant beyond the plan amount. Since no additional pre-CIRP liability was fastened, the requests for adjustment and refund were not maintainable, and the reconnection prayer did not survive separately because a direction had already been issued.
Post-approval tariff revision did not create an independent right to refund or set-off for pre-CIRP electricity dues where the approved resolution plan had already settled and frozen pre-CIRP liabilities inter se the parties. The revised bills were treated only as an internal accounting adjustment reflecting the reduced extent of the respondent's pre-CIRP claim and bad debt, not as an enforceable fresh demand against the appellant beyond the plan amount. Since no additional pre-CIRP liability was fastened, the requests for adjustment and refund were not maintainable, and the reconnection prayer did not survive separately because a direction had already been issued.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.