<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tariff revision after resolution plan approval cannot revive pre-CIRP refund or set-off claims for electricity arrears.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99319</link>
    <description>Post-approval tariff revision did not create an independent right to refund or set-off for pre-CIRP electricity dues where the approved resolution plan had already settled and frozen pre-CIRP liabilities inter se the parties. The revised bills were treated only as an internal accounting adjustment reflecting the reduced extent of the respondent&#039;s pre-CIRP claim and bad debt, not as an enforceable fresh demand against the appellant beyond the plan amount. Since no additional pre-CIRP liability was fastened, the requests for adjustment and refund were not maintainable, and the reconnection prayer did not survive separately because a direction had already been issued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 07:19:13 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 07:19:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=899163" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tariff revision after resolution plan approval cannot revive pre-CIRP refund or set-off claims for electricity arrears.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99319</link>
      <description>Post-approval tariff revision did not create an independent right to refund or set-off for pre-CIRP electricity dues where the approved resolution plan had already settled and frozen pre-CIRP liabilities inter se the parties. The revised bills were treated only as an internal accounting adjustment reflecting the reduced extent of the respondent&#039;s pre-CIRP claim and bad debt, not as an enforceable fresh demand against the appellant beyond the plan amount. Since no additional pre-CIRP liability was fastened, the requests for adjustment and refund were not maintainable, and the reconnection prayer did not survive separately because a direction had already been issued.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 07:19:13 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99319</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>