Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Post-approval tariff revision did not create an independent right to refund or set-off for pre-CIRP electricity dues where the approved resolution plan had already settled and frozen pre-CIRP liabilities inter se the parties. The revised bills were treated only as an internal accounting adjustment reflecting the reduced extent of the respondent's pre-CIRP claim and bad debt, not as an enforceable fresh demand against the appellant beyond the plan amount. Since no additional pre-CIRP liability was fastened, the requests for adjustment and refund were not maintainable, and the reconnection prayer did not survive separately because a direction had already been issued.
Post-approval tariff revision did not create an independent right to refund or set-off for pre-CIRP electricity dues where the approved resolution plan had already settled and frozen pre-CIRP liabilities inter se the parties. The revised bills were treated only as an internal accounting adjustment reflecting the reduced extent of the respondent's pre-CIRP claim and bad debt, not as an enforceable fresh demand against the appellant beyond the plan amount. Since no additional pre-CIRP liability was fastened, the requests for adjustment and refund were not maintainable, and the reconnection prayer did not survive separately because a direction had already been issued.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.