Composite GST notices, mandatory limitation, and same-subject bar: HC upheld valid notices but quashed overlapping proceedings and unauthorised withho...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Post-approval tariff revision did not create an independent right to refund or set-off for pre-CIRP electricity dues where the approved resolution plan had already settled and frozen pre-CIRP liabilities inter se the parties. The revised bills were treated only as an internal accounting adjustment reflecting the reduced extent of the respondent's pre-CIRP claim and bad debt, not as an enforceable fresh demand against the appellant beyond the plan amount. Since no additional pre-CIRP liability was fastened, the requests for adjustment and refund were not maintainable, and the reconnection prayer did not survive separately because a direction had already been issued.
Post-approval tariff revision did not create an independent right to refund or set-off for pre-CIRP electricity dues where the approved resolution plan had already settled and frozen pre-CIRP liabilities inter se the parties. The revised bills were treated only as an internal accounting adjustment reflecting the reduced extent of the respondent's pre-CIRP claim and bad debt, not as an enforceable fresh demand against the appellant beyond the plan amount. Since no additional pre-CIRP liability was fastened, the requests for adjustment and refund were not maintainable, and the reconnection prayer did not survive separately because a direction had already been issued.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.