Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2701 to 2720 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Tax deducted from sale proceeds of immovable property sold by a bank under SARFAESI was held referable to Section 194IA. The High Court reasoned that, in such an auction, the bank is not the owner of the secured asset but only holds possession and a security interest for recovery of dues, acting as a trustee or custodian of the sale proceeds and applying them towards dues, expenses and any surplus to the borrower. Because the property was not the bank's own asset, credit or refund of the tax deducted could not be denied merely because the bank had not offered corresponding income from sale. The orders granting TDS credit were affirmed and the appeal was dismissed.
Tax deducted from sale proceeds of immovable property sold by a bank under SARFAESI was held referable to Section 194IA. The High Court reasoned that, in such an auction, the bank is not the owner of the secured asset but only holds possession and a security interest for recovery of dues, acting as a trustee or custodian of the sale proceeds and applying them towards dues, expenses and any surplus to the borrower. Because the property was not the bank's own asset, credit or refund of the tax deducted could not be denied merely because the bank had not offered corresponding income from sale. The orders granting TDS credit were affirmed and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
