Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether tax deducted at source from the sale proceeds of an immovable property sold in enforcement of security interest could be refunded to the bank when the bank was not the owner of the property and the corresponding income was not shown by it.
Analysis: The amount was deducted at the time of sale of an immovable property, making Section 194IA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 the applicable provision. In a sale under the SARFAESI framework, the bank holds only possession and recovery rights over the secured asset and does not become its owner. The borrower remains the owner, while the bank acts only as a custodian of the sale proceeds and must account for surplus or deficit in accordance with law. On that basis, deduction of tax from the sale consideration did not deprive the bank of entitlement to refund merely because the asset sold did not belong to it.
Conclusion: The bank was entitled to refund of the tax deducted at source, and the challenge by the Revenue failed.