Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2701 to 2720 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
An approved corporate insolvency resolution plan was treated as ative, and because the State had not lodged its claim in the insolvency proceedings and its challenges to the approval order had failed, it could not continue the impugned recovery action or keep the petitioner's input tax credit blocked. The Court quashed the notice and directed unblocking of the ITC and release of the amount admissible in law. This relief was granted without prejudice to any other recovery action that may remain available to the State under law.
An approved corporate insolvency resolution plan was treated as ative, and because the State had not lodged its claim in the insolvency proceedings and its challenges to the approval order had failed, it could not continue the impugned recovery action or keep the petitioner's input tax credit blocked. The Court quashed the notice and directed unblocking of the ITC and release of the amount admissible in law. This relief was granted without prejudice to any other recovery action that may remain available to the State under law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.